'Fat Tax' on Overweight Passengers Proposed by Budget Airline

by Charlotte Cardingham
Published on 22 April 2009
Related Subjects:

Low cost airline, Ryanair, have announced plans to introduce an extra levy on significantly overweight passengers.

Budget airline Ryanair looks set to impose a ‘fat tax’ on overweight individuals who choose to take advantage of their cut-price flights.

This decision follows a survey of 100,000 Ryanair customers, 29% of whom were in favour of a ‘levy on the heavy’.

Other revenue generating alternatives suggested by the airline included the introduction of €3 smoking cabins, a €1 charge for toilet paper (which would be decorated with images of Michael O’Leary – Ryanair’s rather quirky Chief Executive), subscription-only access to Ryanair’s website or a €2 fee that would be payable if you chose to bring your own food onboard.

The airline are now planning to poll their passengers for a second time to decide exactly how this charge should be implemented.

Current suggestions include a ‘charge per surplus kilo’ levy applied to male customers who weigh more than 130Kg (20 stone) and to female customers who weight more than 100Kg (15 stone), a ‘charge per surplus inch’ on those whose waist measurements were greater than 45 inches (applied to male customers) or 40 inches (for female customers) or an ‘applies to all’ rule that stipulates that a passenger must purchase an additional seat if their waist touches both armrests simultaneously.

Stephen McNamara, Ryanair’s PR Chief, commented: "In all cases we've limits at very high levels so that a 'fat tax' will only apply to those really large passengers who invade the space of the passengers sitting beside them.

"These charges, if introduced, might also act as an incentive to some of our very large passengers to lose a little weight and hopefully feel a little lighter and healthier."

Famed for headline grabbing publicity stunts – the airline recently announced plans to charge a fee for the use of onboard toilets – whether the ‘fat tax’ will come to fruition remains to be seen. However, while human rights activists will no doubt be up in arms over the proposals, the airline isn’t treading on new ground. Several American airlines have already introduced similar measures that see significantly overweight passengers purchasing an additional seat if they encroach on the space of others.

Source

Get more travel deals like this every week.
Enter your email and name below to join over 460,000 other members who benefit from our invaluable deals each week.
your email
first name
Add

Add a comment.

(optional)
Name:
Comment:

You have 1000 characters left
 
Please enter the characters to the right
 
 
28

Your Comments

ROGER SIVIERI
on 2 Jun 2010 12:21
I would agree on the fat levey only as long as the airline provide wider seats. Why not weight the passenger with the hold and hand luggage. They could allow up to 20 stone for people (no discrimination between male or female) 10kg for hand and 15 kg for hold. anything over that wirght should be heaviliy charged at say £30 PER KG.
 
Joe
on 11 Jul 2009 11:43
Look let get this into perspective. I travel a lot with work and often carry 30kg of luggage which I get charged 10kg excess on most airlines, now as I weight 72kg myself why should someone who weighs 100kg be allowed to carry 20kgs free??
 
Bnairb
on 25 Jun 2009 01:21
Yes I am overweight, would I pay extra ? Yes but I would expect a larger seat. Which is exactly what I do when I travel long haul, I go premium ecconomy or Club. This could all get so out of hand, there is an additional charge for additional legroom seats on budget airlines already. So should larger seats be available at additional cost, smaller seats also for children and slimmer people at reduced fares. How about an additional charge for disable and wheelchair users or the elderly because they take additional time to get on board, Blind and partally sighted people could also be charged more. A winter levy because we wear more. Where will it end? with Michael O'Leary making a fortune by giving less and charging more. We the fat flyers hold the key if you want cheap(ish) air travel then put up and shut up or go to weight watchers. If you want comfort stay at home or pay more to fly with a proper airline premium or club.
 
sue brennan
on 24 Jun 2009 07:34
good thought but you would find fat people would be to embaraised to travel with you so drop in sales get the staff to smile more and be more helpfull and less rude had some bad staff when i traveled to spain and again when i went to eire they are by far the worst of all airlines sorry someone should be checking how they carry on
 
Aussie Matt
on 23 Jun 2009 15:42
Ryanair are racist. They only let EU citizens check in online. Australians who have lived in the EU must pay an additional £40 per flight to check in.
 
Dan
on 23 Jun 2009 15:22
I find this to cut and dry. Whilst I agree that it's not nice to be squashed into your seat by somebody overweight next to you. I am 6'6 and 19st, but not "overweight" just a big guy. So do I have to pay extra then??? What about boxers, bodybuilders who are also heavier because of muscle?? Just another way of the fat cats lining their pockets even more.
 
Prdaeep
on 4 Jun 2009 08:39
I think then they must reduce ticket for the Low weight peoples ;)
 
Jan
on 8 May 2009 21:07
I absolutely agree with this approach in general. However from the human rights point of you I do not see this happening. At the same time if someone choose to be fat, and there are thousands of these people in western society, they must bare the consequence. I am 183 cm tall and weight 88 kg, with my Gold frequent flyer I can take 30 kg of luggage. That puts me at 118 kg tops. A person of 110 or 130 kg is so much heavier that if I carried that much extra luggage I'd end up paying double the airfare. The fat effect the health care, environment (all the fat that is being transported and burns extra fuel).
 
plump n proud
on 7 May 2009 20:47
I was appaulled at this thought. I am a larger lady and think this is awful I fly 2-4 times a year. I deffo would not fly with the airlines who implement this. My money would go to the provider of the better service. I would not get on scales whether they thought I looked heavy or not. My daughter and husband are under weight who sit next to me so will we get a discount on the lighter people on the aircraft who are not taking up the extra weight? Ludicrous.
 
moneymouth77
on 1 May 2009 10:27
I think this is ludicrous. Not out of any sympathy for grossly overweight people, more from the perspective that RyanAir are adding yet another tax to their so-called cheap flights. There are so many better ways to have a budget holiday...
 
Suzanne
on 30 Apr 2009 01:51
Why the discrepancy between "baseline" weights for men and women? Ryanair is not a health provider - if they introduce anything like this, the same standard should apply to all. Meanwhile, if I had to get on scales at an airport, I wouldn't travel on that airline. Unless it's a Cessna, you don't need my weight prior to loading.
 
Louise
on 29 Apr 2009 17:40
Eurgh I think this is disgusting. Who do RyanAir think they are "encouraging" people to loose weight with their tax - why are they acting like they are doing society a favour when really they just want to make more money! Can you imagine the unnecessary embarassment this would cause people too?
 
Snake
on 23 Apr 2009 22:16
This is a good move, ive had to sit next to over weight peopl on airlines before and its a very unplesent experience when they take up half your seat as well. also we have to pay for luggage if its overweight and they can sometimes weigh more than me and my luggage combined.. why shouldnt they pay for this?
 
Bystander
on 23 Apr 2009 18:40
I don't want to discriminate against fat people, I think in a free society you should live as you want. But when some guy is sitting next to me on a plane and his extra folds are pushing me into the aisle for the whole flight, or all the prices are being jacked up to accomodate the fact that this guy can't put down the fork, then I (and you) am being affected by this guy's lifestyle choice. I'm afraid I agree with this policy. But on the other hand I hate airlines...
 
Julie
on 23 Apr 2009 18:33
I am disgusted at even the thought of this levy. I would let me £'s do the walking and find another airline whether I could fit in the seat or not.
 
GERMANZORRO
on 23 Apr 2009 17:11
I GUESS I WILL JUST FILL UP MY GAS TANK TO GO ON VACATIONS. AND TO HELL WI9TH THE AIRLINES WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PEOPLE. WAIT A MINUTE WASN'T THEIR A LAW FOR ANY TYPE OF BIAS.
 
rcountr
on 23 Apr 2009 16:55
I have flown on flights where people are so big that they are in my space for my seat and make my flight very uncomfortable. I have paid the fare and expect my space to be for me. Not three-quarters for me and one quarter for someone else. I have the right for my full seat.
 
Not large
on 23 Apr 2009 16:47
Ryanair is looking for trouble! No one should weigh over 130kg. Regardless taxing heavy people is just down-right rude! What makes a government unpopular...taxes of course and I sure would not fly with them again is they taxed people for being fat or for choosing healthier food that what the airline provides.
 
D
on 23 Apr 2009 14:09
Um, if you're flying Ryanair then there's no way you're taking a bus to L.A.
 
Michele
on 23 Apr 2009 13:31
This is good. People need to start taking responsibility for their weight because - guess what - it DOES affect other people! Whether you are causing health care prices to raise for everyone or taking up someone else's space on a plane, people who choose to be obese need to accept the consequences of their choices.
 
sssshyourwrong
on 23 Apr 2009 11:37
I just get pissed off for extra weight charges on baggage when there are people twice my weight flying on the plane. think about it
 
Spud
on 23 Apr 2009 10:14
Slow down tubby, your not on the moon yet!
 
Robert Neighbors
on 23 Apr 2009 07:25
If airlines, when ordering their cabin seats, where they are made, to be set at 22" wide, instead of the size they are now. Then everybody would be a lot more comfortable. Also, that`s the size width, first class seats are already, maybe even 2" bigger at 24" wide. But NO! Airlines don`t see it that way. They put in 18", or 19" wide seats, all through the plane then say, Hey you, Fat man / Fat woman, you have to pay twice as much, cause your going to need 2 side by side seats, if you want to fly today, on this plane anyway! It`s a set up folks, don`t let them get any more money out of your pocket. No Sir, not one dime more. You tell the ticket agent, either I get my ticket to fly on your airline today, at the same price as everyone else pays, or I`m going to just take the damn bus out to LA. Then tell`em it`s their move! Stick around and see what happen`s next? Are you flying, or are you going to be bus-in it out to the coast? Good Luck
 
reality
on 23 Apr 2009 05:51
So, do children get discounts based on weight as well?
 
i like this
on 23 Apr 2009 05:06
good
 
kat
on 23 Apr 2009 02:24
that's awful! >:(
 
jolinarodriguez
on 22 Apr 2009 21:40
Good policy. Is this for male passenger only?
 
Woundedduck
on 22 Apr 2009 20:06
I am not a fat person--165 lb, 5'9"--and even for me airline seats are an uncomfortable squeeze. The airlines are just trying to save fuel by discriminating against BB people. Since the U.S. is such a big place and we have no serious long-distance mass transit other than air flight, a boycott will never materialize, so I guess it's up to the overweight to fight back in court.