Higher Mortgage Deposits 'No Bad Thing'

by Peter Wakeford
Posted by Hannah on 14 January 2009
Higher Mortgage Deposits 'No Bad Thing'

Tighter mortgage lending criteria means that first-time buyers need to save up a larger deposit than in the past - but this is "no bad thing", according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders.

First-time property buyers who are required to save up a larger deposit than people purchasing before the credit crunch will see a number of benefits, it has been claimed.

The credit crunch - which started in the US sub-prime mortgage market according to some, including Gordon Brown - has left many lenders wary of providing mortgages. This has led to them tightening their criteria, which means first-time buyers need to leave a bigger deposit.

According to the latest figures from the CML, there were 40,000 home loans approved in October last year - less than half the figure measured during the same month in 2007.

But this is "no bad thing" in many ways, the head of member and external relations at the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) has said. Sue Anderson explained that this situation "helps to protect them, as well as their lender, against further house price falls". First-time buyers are already showing more interest in the market than before, according to a number of reports, mainly due to the cheaper cost of property.

However, Ms Anderson added: "On the other hand, it does mean that they may have to wait a bit longer before they can access mortgage finance if they haven't already got substantial savings accumulated."

Get our free money saving newsletter
Join over 480,000 other subscribers who grab our expert money tips, unmissable money guides & hottest bargains each week in our special email...
 
3

Your Comments

gary
on 7 Feb 2009 20:12
what a load of rubbish. how the hell are first time buyers meant to find 25% of the value of there first home. plus most of the houses they're trying to buy are already in negative equity, and those owners cant move forward either. come on banks and building societies, thats our money your refusing to lend us. sort it out fools.
 
mark
on 19 Jan 2009 21:23
if the regulators had regulated ten years ago house prices would have increased at a slower pace,this would also have stoped abuse off credit cards,re mortgages to pay of credit cards. why do we need ten shops in the same high street selling the same goods three would create competition ??? unfortunatly to late.
 
Anon
on 14 Jan 2009 22:54
What a load of rubbish these people churn out! These are the same people who lent money to people who could not afford it and the mortgages were granted on over inflated prices of the properties. If they had not done this, we would not have the situation we are in now!