Greenpeace Initiates Ingenious Land Purchase Plan to Stop New Heathrow Runway

by Charlotte Cardingham
Published on 13 January 2009
Related Subjects:
Greenpeace Initiates Ingenious Land Purchase Plan to Stop New Heathrow Runway

Hoping to stall the development of a new runway at Heathrow, the environmental organisation have purchased a plot of land that sits directly in its path.

In their latest attempt to block the planned expansion of Heathrow airport, Greenpeace campaigners have purchased an acre of land earmarked for the new runway.

The group plan to divide the land into as many as 4,000 separate pieces and sell them to climate-aware individuals all over the world. By taking this step, Greenpeace hope to delay, and ultimately prevent, the construction of a third runway and sixth terminal at Heathrow airport.

It is hoped that the additional time and cost that the airport’s owners, BAA, will incur in their attempts to purchase each of the small plots of land back from their owners will ultimately mean that the much-contested development is abandoned, even if the government’s compulsory purchase process is put into force.

Should the planned development go ahead it will see a reported 2,000 people in the village of Sipson lose their homes as the village is demolished to make room for the new runway.

More worrying still, the plans also imply that the number of flights into and out of the airport to increase from 480,000 to 720,000 each year. This will significantly increase both the noise and pollution levels the airport emits, and make Heathrow the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the UK.

While the purchase price of the protester's field is not known, several celebrities are confirmed to have made a contribution to the cost.  Actress Emma Thomson and impressionist Alistair Mcgowan have both given their name to the cause.

“I don’t understand how any government remotely serious about committing to reversing climate change can even consider these ridiculous plans. We’ll stop this from happening even if we have to move in and plant vegetables.” Said the Oscar-winning actress.

Greenpeace director, John Sauven has confirmed that no profit will be made from the resale of the land and acknowledged that these plans have been a long time coming to fruition. It’s believed that Greenpeace had to purchase the land under the guise of setting up a donkey sanctuary in order to get the sale approved.

Despite receiving resistance from opposition parties and many environmental charities, the government were due to approve plans for the new runway this week. However, it is now believed that the decision has been put on hold until after Gordon Brown meets with Labour back benchers.

Supporters of the new runway have argued that the planned expansion is essential for the UK economy going forward, with 65,000 new jobs expected to be created as a result.

Source

Get more deals like this every week.
Enter your email and name below to join over 460,000 other members who benefit from our invaluable deals each week.
your email
first name
Add

Add a comment.

(optional)
Name:
Comment:

You have 1000 characters left
 
Please enter the characters to the right
 
 
10

Your Comments

Treeve
on 20 Jan 2009 22:15
land clearances are never fair or moral yet we keep letting it happen because money and greed are more powerful than morals
 
Fatima
on 15 Jan 2009 14:24
WELL DONE......So proud of Greenpeace....they are actually doing somthing to help...a very gutsy move..simply amazing...
 
Winefred M
on 15 Jan 2009 12:14
Good fro you Greenpeace! Glad I´m a member of this organization.It gives me the shivers just the idea of expanding to please the consumers,US,we are also to blame. How many of us travel more than a thousand miles a year or more. THINK IT OVER! I always say if you can travel by car,train or other means do that.There are some politicians that travel from one city to the next by plane, can you imagine. I said my peace.
 
WILLIS DE HANABIUS
on 14 Jan 2009 17:21
THATS GREAT...SO INSTEAD OF LANDING FASTER AND SAVING FUEL THEY AIRPLANES WILL NOW HAVE TO CIRCLE THE AIRPORT FOR LONGER PERIODS BURING FUEL...THANK YOU GREEN'PIECE'....
 
JBGIRAFFX
on 14 Jan 2009 17:18
When are people, their special interest groups and their governments going to learn that the Old Economic models are dead or dying and that, when it comes to cleaning up the planet, it CANNOT be and MUST NOT be about the money. Who cares about the economy if life as we know it ceases to exist. Typical closed-minded, short-sighted IDIOTS!
 
Mike Giles
on 14 Jan 2009 16:11
Excellent idea which I whole-heartedly support. I have friends who live around the current Heathrow flight paths and they are rarely gaps between the sound of planes throughtout the whole day. In short, they have no real peace. I cannot believe it was ever seriously thought this extra runway was a 'sensible' idea under any guise.
 
Moongrim
on 14 Jan 2009 11:34
Obviously Greenpeace has never heard of Eminent Domain.
 
giff
on 14 Jan 2009 00:17
flights at Heathrow are already overbooked and a new runway ISN't the answer...if you can't manage the resource you have effectively then just getting one more will temporarily look like it's fixed the issue but then the same inefficiencies at the source of the current problem will simply show up again. "65,000 jobs will be added"...blah blah blah...oh yeah? for how long? and who really gets the cream on those jobs??? the developers, the airlines, the executives...so let's not be disingenuous and pretend it's about benefit to "the people" clearly somebody and probably MANY somebodies will get rich off the project...but it won't be the average bloke.
 
D WHITTAKER
on 13 Jan 2009 22:25
WELL DONE GREENPEACE. you should divide this land into millions of small plots causing an impossible situation for repurchase.
 
Mac
on 13 Jan 2009 19:21
the funny thing is that the government will probably buy the land as public domain and pay more than the real value. The 4000 buyers who want to support a good cause will end up making a profit.