Savers Suffer From Premium Bond Fund Shrinkage

by Peter Wakeford
Published on 8 January 2009
Savers Suffer From Premium Bond Fund Shrinkage

NS&I says that the pot has got smaller, thanks to recent rate cuts.

Interest rate cuts from the Bank of England have hit the premium bond market hard, operator National Savings & Investments (NS&I) has revealed.

The bonds' regular prize draws are popular with many savers - indeed, around one Briton in three is thought to own them. However, the Bank's policy of aggressive reductions to its official rate since October 2008 has made the chances of hitting the jackpot smaller than before.

This is because the prize fund is calculated by totting up the amount of interest the total value of eligible bonds accumulates over a one-month period. Therefore, as interest rates shrink, so does the fund.

Accordingly, January 2007's pot of £114 million dropped to just £57 million this month. Over the same period, the Bank reduced its base rate by more than 300 basis points.

NS&I spokesperson Angela Mason said: "The rate of return on premium bonds, as with other savings products, is influenced by economic circumstances. Given the historically low levels the base rate has now reached, we are looking closely at all the options available to us so that we can make the right decision for all premium bond holders.

"People invest in premium bonds for different reasons. This may be for the chance and excitement of winning large prizes, or many regular tax-free prizes or because premium bonds are simple to manage and can offer easy access to their investment."

The premium bonds survey was taken prior to the latest rate cut from the Bank, which was announced today. The new official rate stands at 1.5 percent, down from December's two percent - the lowest since the institution was founded in the 1600s.

Get our free money saving newsletter
Join over 480,000 other subscribers who grab our expert money tips, unmissable money guides & hottest bargains each week in our special email...
 
7

Your Comments

IAN CORMACK
on 12 Mar 2009 05:51
IS IT WORTH SAVING ANYWHERE NOWADAYS?
 
Marie
on 21 Jan 2009 21:06
What a geat idea Bernie !
 
James
on 18 Jan 2009 09:04
I agree with Bernie 2. They should give out 40 $50,000's instead of 2 million's which only two people benefit from. This way forty people would have smiles on their faces.
 
Jim Evans
on 13 Jan 2009 11:51
I also agree with Bernie. Scrap the million pound prizes and have more smaller ones.
 
Subodh
on 12 Jan 2009 14:11
Extremly disappointed with the current prize funds. According to NS&I leaflet people those who invest £30,000 have the chance of winning at least 17 prizes per annum. I am sorry that I don't find any truth in it. I have decided to keep my investment another few months and then I will have to find a btter home for my savings.
 
Mark
on 10 Jan 2009 22:04
A great idea from Bernie. The next biggest prize is quite big enough. I hope Angela and the team remember people who invest in bonds are not looking for the obscene lottery size jackpots but would rather have an increased chance of smaller prizes. As interest rates are so low I was just about to put a significant sum into bonds with a view to hopefully receiving regular small wins. If the odds have reduced that much, I will look to invest elsewhere.
 
Bernie
on 9 Jan 2009 00:51
Suggestion for Angela Mason.....what about scrapping the million pound prizes and distributing that into the lesser amounts?